A little more about Null Physics

December 18, 2008 on 4:46 am | In Null Physics | 1 Comment

Well, I’ve learned that a lot of people claim that Witt is a “crack pot.” I can’t figure out why though, it seems the only people who comment are people who haven’t actually read the book, or can’t do the math anyway. I am not sure what to think myself. The math is a bit complex, and the book seems a little ambiguous, but who knows, it could be a great theory that needed to get published before working out all the details. It certainly is thought provoking and I don’t believe that my ideas based on it are wrong if he is. I just keep thinking what if that was us? Well at least I don’t use any complex, confusing math figures. According to Discovery Magazine, Melvin is a respectible alternative scientist. He took a test on the website that the author of null physics did not pass.

Now, today I saw an article in the Washington Post (Wednesday, December 17th, pg A15) about Dark Energy. At first Melvin read it to me and I thought it was saying that dark energy was supposed to cause a “big rip.” After the hysterical laughter subsided I read it myself. It says it will NOT cause a “big rip,” meaning dark energy will not tear everything apart. Apparently it is supposed to just separate everything. I can’t help but shake my head. This stuff about dark energy sounds like the way people talked about the earth being in the center of the universe, or that it was flat. I understand, it is hard to figure out, I really don’t have any better ideas, but it just strikes me funny. My own guess is that dark energy is the real source of gravity. I think of gravity, if it were two dimensional, it would be like bowling balls on a waterbed. According to their weight they would sink deeper and pull more things in to them. I think the waterbed is the dark energy. Without it, the bowling balls would be sitting on a hard floor.

Let’s hear what you think of that! I love your comments.

1 Comment »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. “The math is a bit complex” … and wrong.
    * Terrence Witt redefines the concept of infinity as a length with magnitude, i.e. as a finite quantity!
    * He defines a line as a series of points written as zeros, treats them as numbers so that they add up to zero and then treats the number zero as a point again!

    Comment by Reality Check — February 4, 2009 #

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^