TIME TO GO FROM WOW TO HOW!

 

Science has struggled with the reuniting of spirit and materialism for over 150 years. The Nobel Prize winners of the last century felt they documented spiritual realities in scientific research, and yet there has been no change in our underlying materialistic paradigm.  The materialistic paradigm demeans and trivializes the spirit of man, and in turn demeans and trivializes our scientific genius.  So many of our problems come from a world wide lack of meaning and sense of interconnectedness; poverty, unequal resources, war, depression, anxiety, and random violence are endemic throughout the world. 

 

I will of course continue to research and write for the medical and scientific literature.  I have a busy private practice of medicine, and am actively researching practical ways to incorporate the new medical paradigm into the medical world in ways that insurance companies will see as cost effective and reimburse for.  That, for me, is the ultimate test of my new ideas, "can we get someone else to feel they are cost effective and pay for them in the context of patient care.

Learing to remote view, was for me, the proof I needed to go from intellectually appreciating my theories to knowing that they are true.  The great psychic Ingo Swan defined remote viewing as learning how to perceive reality.  The Department of Defense defined remote viewing as the ability to obtain information about a remote target such as an event or geographical structure that cannot be perceived by ordinary perceptions.

 

Remote viewing is a type of non-local perception, the ability to obtain information from, well, a "god" as Pauline would say, or "quantum non-locality" in my talk. Seeing angels, having lucid dreams, premonitions that come true, intuitions, remembering past lives, having visits from children and loved ones are all examples of non-local perceptions.  The difference with remote viewing is that there is an actual real world target that can then be compared to efforts to remote view, and one's intuitions validated. By learning to remote view, in turn one learns how to trust intuition and spiritual insights in other arenas.

 

ALMOST ANYONE CAN LEARN TO REMOTE VIEW AND PROVE OR DISPROVE THE NEW PARADIGM FOR THEMSELVES

 

To truly learn to remote view, I highly recommend the course I took from Paul H Smith (www.rviewer.com). He wrote the Stanford Research Institute Protocol on remote viewing, developed by theoretical physicist Hal Puthoff and psychic Ingo Swam.  It is an intense five day course, 10 hours a day with then homework. He typically works one on one much of the time with students and has two teachers for 2-3 students.

 

LEARNING TO REMOTE VIEW UNLOCKS A WORLD OF POSSIBILITIES AND TEACHES US THAT IMPOSSIBLE CAN HAPPEN!

 

We all know that small children can see angels and perceive realities the rest of us dismiss as childish nonsense.  Once you learn for yourself that you can access information about a “target” around the world, your mind will understand it can also access the genetic information that can heal cancer and autoimmune diseases, create a scientific framework for energy healing, make past live and visions of the future possible, and interactions with other realities expected. You will create for yourself that childlike world of endless possibilities again.

 

Please note: We teach the remote viewing PROTOCOL in our workshops, not how to actually remote view. We do not want anyone to confuse what we do with the intense training of you would receive from Paul Smith. We teach a concept and have had success at teaching anyone how to access information from quantum non-locality and in turn learn about intuition and spirituality in their own lives. In our more intense workshops, we hire CRV trainers who are qualified to teach the rigorous and intense remote viewing that I learned from Paul Smith.                  

The following illustrates the difference between what we teach and what Paul Smith teaches. When I graduated from his basic remote viewing course, he congratulated me and told me that initially they didn't think I could remote view my way out of my underwear drawer.  Now look at these two churches, he said. They look almost identical.  I bet you would be satisfied if you could describe either one of them as a target.  I acknowledged this was true.  He said, "well, son, an operative team has to know the differences between these churches, for the simple reason that one is in France and one is in London."